ernster.dev
Evergence
Civilisational continuity and open-ended evolution: a provisional philosophical, scientific and mathematical research framework for the continued survival and evolution of humanity and other life. Thesis work rather than software, kept beside the two civic documents written in the same voice.
Where the claims stand
A framework about survival is easy to misread as a promise. This one labels its own material and publishes the labels with the work, so a reader always knows which register a sentence is in.
Balanced ternary, Euler's formula, roots of unity, infinite product spaces. Results that stand on their own; none is a physical theory of civilisation.
Thermodynamics, the observed expansion of the universe and the standard cosmological model, within its tested domain.
The ultimate fate of the universe, the nature of dark energy and whether new physics could alter the outcome. Open questions, treated as open.
Ternary states on arbitrarily many dimensions; evolution as new degrees of freedom; transitions that preserve a civilisation. Research language, labelled as such.
Survival with evolution is the principal ambition, not expansion for its own sake; the framework states what it does not propose as plainly as what it does: no prescribed purpose for all life, no compulsory immortality, no mandate to expand without limit, no claim that current physics already permits escape from heat death, no architect with unquestionable authority. No mathematical elegance, by itself, establishes physical reality.
Read the framework → Evergence Read the research programme →
Civic documents in the same voice
Two earlier documents that apply the same structural reading to governance and to the constraints an AI system must treat as hard. Written before Evergence; its ethics and architects documents carry the same commitments forward.